<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ChipKohrman.com &#187; blog post</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chipkohrman.com/keyword/blog-post/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chipkohrman.com</link>
	<description>The Inbox for My Curiousity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 03:39:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Atheists at the Museum</title>
		<link>http://chipkohrman.com/2008/01/16/atheists-at-the-museum/</link>
		<comments>http://chipkohrman.com/2008/01/16/atheists-at-the-museum/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 03:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chip Kohrman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sources of Inspiration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chipkohrman.com/2008/01/16/atheists-at-the-museum/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Josh Spero, writer for Guardian Unlimited, feels he&#8217;s missing out on something with religious art.&#160; &#8220;It&#8217;s just gold leaf and too many halos,&#8221; Spero says.&#160; He feels that being an atheist has excluded him from understanding its meaning.&#160; Spero&#8217;s stuck on appearance and can&#8217;t move beyond that.&#160; So I wonder, can we bridge the gap [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style="border-top-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px" height="212" alt="Caravaggio: The Sacrifice of Isaac" src="http://chipkohrman.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/caravaggio-the-sacrifice-of-isaac.jpg" width="500" border="0"></p>
<p>Josh Spero, writer for <a href="http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/art/2008/01/i_cannot_see_the_divine_in_rel.html" target="_blank">Guardian Unlimited</a>, feels he&#8217;s missing out on something with religious art.&nbsp; &#8220;It&#8217;s just gold leaf and too many halos,&#8221; Spero says.&nbsp; He feels that being an atheist has excluded him from understanding its meaning.&nbsp; Spero&#8217;s stuck on appearance and can&#8217;t move beyond that.&nbsp; So I wonder, can we bridge the gap between non-belief and religious works of art?</p>
<p><span id="more-32"></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;<img style="border-top-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px" height="212" alt="Duccio di Boninsegna: Madonna and Child Enthroned with Angels and Saints" src="http://chipkohrman.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/duccio-di-boninsegna-madonna-and-child-enthroned-with-angels-and-saints.jpg" width="500" border="0"> Spero says:</p>
<p>&#8220;Matteo di Giovanni&#8217;s <em>Assumption of the Virgin</em> altarpiece (1474) is a pious fiesta of angels dancing around the Virgin against a blinding gold background&#8230; There is nothing technically wrong with these paintings but they fail to stir anything within me&#8230; If a religious person approached di Giovanni&#8217;s altarpiece in its original position in Asciano&#8217;s church, they might see this painting shimmering under dusty rays, glowing with the Virgin&#8217;s aura of holiness. It would be awe-inspiring in the old-fashioned sense.&#8221; (Spero)</p>
<p><a href="http://chipkohrman.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/matteo-di-giovanni-assumptionofthevirginmary.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img style="border-top-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; margin: 15px 15px 15px 0px; border-right-width: 0px" height="260" alt="Matteo di Giovanni: Assumption of the Virgin Mary" src="http://chipkohrman.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/matteo-di-giovanni-assumptionofthevirginmary-thumb.jpg" width="144" align="left" border="0"></a>I don&#8217;t live in the 1400&#8242;s.&nbsp; And I&#8217;m not standing in front of Giovanni&#8217;s <em>Assumption</em>.&nbsp; What&#8217;s more, I&#8217;m Christian, so I could be painting my own assumption here, but I think that we can at least <em>attempt</em> to understand our differences.&nbsp; Spero falls short.&nbsp; He <em>wonders</em> if he can experience the meaning of religious works of art (which seems to short-change atheists&#8217; abilities), but that&#8217;s where he stops.&nbsp; Spero can have the same experience a Christian can have with the <em>Assumption, </em>but it requires more than wondering about it.&nbsp; Just like Hindi, Buddhist, Muslim, or Jewish works of art can inspire me&#8230; but I would have to do my part because the work wasn&#8217;t created with me in mind.&nbsp; However, we do share human experiences: pain, happiness, anger, excitement, etc.&nbsp; It may be easier for a religious person to connect with religious works of art, but the simple fact is that we are all people.&nbsp; And common ground exists among the gaps.</p>
<p>So <em>postpone</em> the disbelief.&nbsp; Put yourself in Giovanni&#8217;s place.&nbsp; &#8220;Come on in boys, the water&#8217;s fine!&#8221; (Delmar, <em>Oh Brother, Where Art Thou?</em>)</p>
<p>Spero&#8217;s post and the comments that follow are worth a read: <a href="http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/art/2008/01/i_cannot_see_the_divine_in_rel.html">Guardian Unlimited: Arts blog &#8211; art: I cannot see the divine in religious art</a> (January 11, 2008)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chipkohrman.com/2008/01/16/atheists-at-the-museum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
